On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:31:03 -0500 Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What lash is this anyway? is the modern, useful, actually handy for > > stuff lash as in http://www.nongnu.org/lash/ or the ladcca from dawn > > of time one? > > 0.5.0+ versions of LASH do not contain the phrase "ladcca" in any way > (including > filenames). > > >From a quick glance, neither does Muse 0.8.1, so I would assume this is a > >system > configuration problem. I _do_ have cvs lash installed and debian's ladcca package, too. I asssumed that because of the differing naming schemes i wouldn't run into trouble. Seems i was wrong. Flo -- Palimm Palimm! http://tapas.affenbande.org
