On 1/12/17 13:38, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 01/11/2017 09:36 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> Jens,
>>
>> On 1/12/17 12:52, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 12 2017, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>>> All block device data fields and functions returning a number of 512B
>>>> sectors are by convention named xxx_sectors while names in the form
>>>> of xxx_size are generally used for a number of bytes. The 
>>>> blk_queue_zone_size
>>>> and bdev_zone_size functions were not following this convention so rename
>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>> This is a style fix and no functional change is introduced by this patch.
>>>
>>> I agree, this cleans it up. Applied.
>>
>> Thank you. I saw that you applied to for-4.11/block. Could we get these
>> in applied to 4.10-rc so that the zoned block device API is cleaner from
>> the first stable release of that API?
> 
> Sure, I did consider that as well. Since I just pushed out the 4.11
> branch, I'll rebase and yank these into the 4.10 branch instead.

Thanks !

-- 
Damien Le Moal, Ph.D.
Sr. Manager, System Software Research Group,
Western Digital Corporation
damien.lem...@wdc.com
(+81) 0466-98-3593 (ext. 513593)
1 kirihara-cho, Fujisawa,
Kanagawa, 252-0888 Japan
www.wdc.com, www.hgst.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to