Jens, On 1/13/17 05:49, Jens Axboe wrote: > Just in case you missed it, I had to fold your two patches. Looking at > it again, what is going on? You rename a function, and then patch #2 > renames the use of that function in a different spot? How did that ever > pass your testing? For something intended for the current series, please > be more careful than that, that's just sloppy.
I created two patches, one for each component/maintainer involved: block/you and f2fs/Jaegeuk. That was indeed a very stupid idea as the 2 patches must always go together (and that is how I tested). A single patch was the right way to do things. My apologies for this mistake and thank you very much for fixing it. I will be more careful in the future. Best regards. -- Damien Le Moal, Ph.D. Sr. Manager, System Software Research Group, Western Digital Corporation damien.lem...@wdc.com (+81) 0466-98-3593 (ext. 513593) 1 kirihara-cho, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, 252-0888 Japan www.wdc.com, www.hgst.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
