From: Li Nan <[email protected]>

'bb->shift' is used directly in badblocks. It is wrong, fix it.

Fixes: 3ea3354cb9f0 ("badblocks: improve badblocks_check() for multiple ranges 
handling")
Signed-off-by: Li Nan <[email protected]>
---
 block/badblocks.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/badblocks.c b/block/badblocks.c
index db4ec8b9b2a8..bcee057efc47 100644
--- a/block/badblocks.c
+++ b/block/badblocks.c
@@ -880,8 +880,8 @@ static int _badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, 
int sectors,
                /* round the start down, and the end up */
                sector_t next = s + sectors;
 
-               rounddown(s, bb->shift);
-               roundup(next, bb->shift);
+               rounddown(s, 1 << bb->shift);
+               roundup(next, 1 << bb->shift);
                sectors = next - s;
        }
 
@@ -1157,8 +1157,8 @@ static int _badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, 
sector_t s, int sectors)
                 * isn't than to think a block is not bad when it is.
                 */
                target = s + sectors;
-               roundup(s, bb->shift);
-               rounddown(target, bb->shift);
+               roundup(s, 1 << bb->shift);
+               rounddown(target, 1 << bb->shift);
                sectors = target - s;
        }
 
@@ -1288,8 +1288,8 @@ static int _badblocks_check(struct badblocks *bb, 
sector_t s, int sectors,
 
                /* round the start down, and the end up */
                target = s + sectors;
-               rounddown(s, bb->shift);
-               roundup(target, bb->shift);
+               rounddown(s, 1 << bb->shift);
+               roundup(target, 1 << bb->shift);
                sectors = target - s;
        }
 
-- 
2.39.2


Reply via email to