On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 04:10:59PM +0800, Zheng Qixing wrote:
> From: Li Nan <[email protected]>
> 
> Factor out try_adjacent_combine(), and it will be used in the later patch.
>

Which patch is try_adjacent_combine() used in? I don't see that at a quick 
glance.

Thanks.

Coly Li

 
> Signed-off-by: Li Nan <[email protected]>
> ---
>  block/badblocks.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/badblocks.c b/block/badblocks.c
> index bcee057efc47..f069c93e986d 100644
> --- a/block/badblocks.c
> +++ b/block/badblocks.c
> @@ -855,6 +855,31 @@ static void badblocks_update_acked(struct badblocks *bb)
>               bb->unacked_exist = 0;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Return 'true' if the range indicated by 'bad' is exactly backward
> + * overlapped with the bad range (from bad table) indexed by 'behind'.
> + */
> +static bool try_adjacent_combine(struct badblocks *bb, int prev)
> +{
> +     u64 *p = bb->page;
> +
> +     if (prev >= 0 && (prev + 1) < bb->count &&
> +         BB_END(p[prev]) == BB_OFFSET(p[prev + 1]) &&
> +         (BB_LEN(p[prev]) + BB_LEN(p[prev + 1])) <= BB_MAX_LEN &&
> +         BB_ACK(p[prev]) == BB_ACK(p[prev + 1])) {
> +             p[prev] = BB_MAKE(BB_OFFSET(p[prev]),
> +                               BB_LEN(p[prev]) + BB_LEN(p[prev + 1]),
> +                               BB_ACK(p[prev]));
> +
> +             if ((prev + 2) < bb->count)
> +                     memmove(p + prev + 1, p + prev + 2,
> +                             (bb->count -  (prev + 2)) * 8);
> +             bb->count--;
> +             return true;
> +     }
> +     return false;
> +}
> +
>  /* Do exact work to set bad block range into the bad block table */
>  static int _badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
>                         int acknowledged)
> @@ -1022,20 +1047,7 @@ static int _badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, 
> sector_t s, int sectors,
>        * merged. (prev < 0) condition is not handled here,
>        * because it's already complicated enough.
>        */
> -     if (prev >= 0 &&
> -         (prev + 1) < bb->count &&
> -         BB_END(p[prev]) == BB_OFFSET(p[prev + 1]) &&
> -         (BB_LEN(p[prev]) + BB_LEN(p[prev + 1])) <= BB_MAX_LEN &&
> -         BB_ACK(p[prev]) == BB_ACK(p[prev + 1])) {
> -             p[prev] = BB_MAKE(BB_OFFSET(p[prev]),
> -                               BB_LEN(p[prev]) + BB_LEN(p[prev + 1]),
> -                               BB_ACK(p[prev]));
> -
> -             if ((prev + 2) < bb->count)
> -                     memmove(p + prev + 1, p + prev + 2,
> -                             (bb->count -  (prev + 2)) * 8);
> -             bb->count--;
> -     }
> +     try_adjacent_combine(bb, prev);
>  
>       if (space_desired && !badblocks_full(bb)) {
>               s = orig_start;
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

-- 
Coly Li

Reply via email to