On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 07:31 +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote: > Hi, > > * Pavel Machek (pa...@suse.cz) wrote: > > > Does ext2/3 and vfat survive that kind of attacks? Those are 'in > > production' and should survive it... > > I regularly (once or twice a week) test 100 corrupted images of > vfat, udf, msdos, swap, iso9660, ext2, ext3, ext4, minix, bfs, befs, > hfs, hfs+, qnx4, affs and cramfs on each of my two test machines. > > They are all pretty stable, one remaining thing on my list i didnt have > time to look into was an issue with fat (msdos) triggering a bug in > buffer.c the other is a warning with ext4 in jbd2/checkpoint.c:166 > > If there is a filesystem you are interested in thats not on the list > or that you want me to test a bit more, just let me know >
squashfs is in the kernel now, that would be good to see as well. I didn't realize you were doing such extensive tests, thanks for doing them. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
