Chris Mason wrote (ao): > Jens Axboe tried to reproduce the phoronix results on his ocz drive, > and generally found that each run was slower than the last regardless > of which mount options were used. This isn't entirely surprising, but > it did make it very difficult to nail down good or bad performance.
The performance should stabilize within a handful max fills I believe? There should be a moment where things don't get more complicated for the controller I thought. -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
