Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw <at> ithnet.com> writes: [snip] > > Can someone explain to a quite naive person like me why one should be > interested in SSDs that perform worse than Intel? Why shouldn't I just buy the > best-performing product? This is a moving market, and it is obvious that the > bad performers will be left behind... > If you really care to fiddle with ssd options then use a real bad hw for > testing the performance - take an ide interface and connect a CF card. > This is a common setup for embedded usage and frequently used. Everything in > between CF and Intel will just be dead before your fs options will become > really stable. So why loose time with it? >
Depends on who you talk to. http://www.tomshardware.com/news/ocz-ssd-vertex-intel-solid-state,7127.html "OCZ Says Its New Vertex SSD Beats Intel's X25-E" I am not taking sides. I am just saying that the SSD market is fluid. --Mike Ramsey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
