My fault then, i thought it was a recent article (the discussion appeared recently on the list) , i read it all except the date. I didn't see it was from 29 may. I apologize.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:44 PM, nightrow<night...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you look here : http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page in the > benchmarking section, you will notice that the test was made more than one > month ago. > I also mentionned, as said by chris on phoronix phorums, that kernel > starting from 2.6.30 should be faster. > > I think we should expect them to run it periodicaly against newer version. > > I made the link to the phoronix test. They may not be the best, but this is > all I found. If you find any better test, don't hesitate to add them. > > disclaimer: I'm not a btrfs developer, just a entusiast that follows > the developement. > > Jb benoit. > > Jaime sanchez wrote : >> >> They are using 2.6.29.4 kernel, it isn't a bit old?? >> >> I think that kernel doesn't have the last btrfs updates, and that it >> is a very bad work and benchmarks results from phoronix part. If u are >> benchmarking an experimental filesystem benchmark it with the lastest >> updaets ¿? it doesn't have sense. >> >> > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
