Am Freitag 11 Dezember 2009 00:15:46 schrieb Johannes Hirte:
> Am Freitag 25 September 2009 00:06:23 schrieb Edward Shishkin:
> > Hello everyone.
> 
> ...
> 
> > The following patches are for Fedora 10(**).
> > The distro-independent package will be put to kernel.org a bit later.
> >
> >
> > All comments, bugreports, etc. are welcome as usual.
> 
> Ok, I have another comment/bugreport *g*.
> 
> I'm testing this patch with gentoo, so the grub sources are not identicaly
>  the same. With this patches applied, grub is unable to detect JFS or XFS
>  filesystems. XFS is reported as unknown, JFS is reported as btrfs.
>  Reiserfs and ext2/3 are detected as expected.

A possible solution is to put FSYS_BTRFS on the end of struct fsys_entry 
fsys_table. I've tested with FSYS_BTFS as the second last entry, the last is 
still FFS.

diff -Nru grub-0.97-r9/stage2/disk_io.c grub-0.97-r10/stage2/disk_io.c
--- grub-0.97-r9/stage2/disk_io.c       2009-12-10 23:41:37.000000000 +0100
+++ grub-0.97-r10/stage2/disk_io.c      2009-12-11 00:50:51.555007247 +0100
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@
 # ifdef FSYS_ISO9660
   {"iso9660", iso9660_mount, iso9660_read, iso9660_dir, 0, 0},
 # endif
+# ifdef FSYS_BTRFS
+  {"btrfs", btrfs_mount, btrfs_read, btrfs_dir, 0, btrfs_embed},
+# endif
   /* XX FFS should come last as it's superblock is commonly crossing tracks
      on floppies from track 1 to 2, while others only use 1.  */
 # ifdef FSYS_FFS

With this order, XFS and JFS filesystems are identified correct. But I think, 
this is just a workaround.


regards,
  Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to