On 10-04-20 12:50, Sean Bartell wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:55:38PM +0800, Wengang Wang wrote: > > I guess the reason is that the 300M file btrfs and the one on your > > partition have different block size. Thus 65k zeros on your file image > > doesn't mean 65k on the partition. So maybe you will try with blocks > > instead of bytes. > > Actually, the block size doesn't matter for this--the superblock is > always at 0x10000. Alli, I think you'll have to upload the start of the > partition so someone can take a look at it.
I see. Thanks all for my knowledge! regards, wengang. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
