On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:58:03AM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > CHRISTOPH AND ANDREW, if you disagree and your concerns have > not been resolved, please speak up.
Anything that need modification of a normal non-shared fs is utterly broken and you'll get a clear NAK, so the propsal before is a good one. There's a couple more issues like the still weird prototypes, e.g. and i_ino might not be enoug to uniquely identify an inode on serveral filesystems that use 64-bit inode inode numbers on 32-bit systems. Also making the ops vector global is just a bad idea. There is nothing making this sort of caching inherently global. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
