Excerpts from liubo's message of 2011-03-16 22:10:09 -0400:
> On 03/16/2011 05:06 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Chris Mason <chris.ma...@oracle.com> wrote:
> >> Excerpts from Andreas Dilger's message of 2011-03-15 18:06:49 -0400:
> >>> On 2011-03-15, at 2:57 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 04:26:50PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> >>>>>  #define FS_EXTENT_FL         0x00080000 /* Extents */
> >>>>>  #define FS_DIRECTIO_FL       0x00100000 /* Use direct i/o */
> >>>>> +#define FS_NOCOW_FL          0x00800000 /* Do not cow file */
> >>>>> +#define FS_COW_FL            0x01000000 /* Cow file */
> >>>>>  #define FS_RESERVED_FL       0x80000000 /* reserved for ext2 lib */
> >>>> I'm fine with it.  I'll defer the check for conflicts with extN-specific 
> >>>> flags
> >>>> to Ted, though.
> >>> Looking at the upstream e2fsprogs I see in that range:
> >>>
> >>>> #define EXT4_EXTENTS_FL           0x00080000 /* Inode uses extents */
> >>>> #define EXT4_EA_INODE_FL          0x00200000 /* Inode used for large EA 
> >>>> */
> >>>> #define EXT4_EOFBLOCKS_FL         0x00400000 /* Blocks allocated beyond 
> >>>> EOF */
> >>>> #define EXT4_SNAPFILE_FL          0x01000000 /* Inode is a snapshot */
> >>>> #define EXT4_SNAPFILE_DELETED_FL  0x04000000 /* Snapshot is being 
> >>>> deleted */
> >>>> #define EXT4_SNAPFILE_SHRUNK_FL   0x08000000 /* Snapshot shrink has 
> >>>> completed */
> >>>> #define EXT2_RESERVED_FL          0x80000000 /* reserved for ext2 lib */
> >>>>
> >>>> #define EXT2_FL_USER_VISIBLE      0x004BDFFF /* User visible flags */
> >>> so there is a conflict with FS_COW_FL and EXT4_SNAPFILE_FL.  I don't know 
> >>> the semantics of those two flags enough to say for sure whether it is 
> >>> reasonable that they alias to each other, but at first glance "COW" and 
> >>> "SNAPSHOT" don't seem completely unrelated.
> > 
> > EXT4_SNAPFILE_FL indicates a special system snapshot file, so it has
> > no equivalence relation with FS_COW_FL.
> > Please use 0x02000000 for FS_COW_FL.
> 
> Fine with that, but it's up to Chris. :)

I'd rather not conflict unless we're critically short on space.

> > 
> > EXT4_SNAPFILE_DELETED_FL is a persistent state of a snapshot file,
> > which is no longer
> > available as a mountable device, but cannot be unlinked because it
> > holds changed data sets
> > needed by older snapshots.
> > 
> > EXT4_SNAPFILE_SHRUNK_FL is a persistent state of a (deleted) snapshot
> > file, which has
> > undergone a "shrink" process to free all change sets not needed by
> > older snapshots.
> > The persistence of the flag is needed to avoid tedious shrinking when
> > it is not needed.
> > 
> > 
> >> In the btrfs case FS_COW_FL means to do COW even when there are no
> >> snapshots.  FS_NOCOW_FL means to do cow only when there are snapshots.
> >>
> > 
> > I am interested in FS_NOCOW_FL as well, but for my implementation it would 
> > mean
> > do not do COW on rewrites even when there are snapshots, so a user can
> > create a pre-allocated
> > "island of blocks", which are pinned to a physical location, for raw
> > VM image for example.

I'm not sure how the island of blocks idea can work with snapshots?
Wouldn't the snapshot corrupt if anything in the island were changed?

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to