You don't understood me. Ofc the developer need bug reports and all that
stuff. But it's the way youre doing it. Imho a lot of your mails sounds
like the only goal of them are to punish btrfs.
Maybe I'm the only one who feels this way, then I'm sorry. I'll be quite
about this topic now. I've to admit that I was a little bit drunk
yesterday. Sorry again!
Regards,
Felix
On 7/10/11 3:29 AM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Felix,
Du meintest am 10.07.11:
Did you ever say something positive about btrfs? :D All I read from
in the last months is complaining about btrfs.
I use it, since many months.
But it's still an adventure, I won't use it for valuable data.
I'm sorry but it seems that 90% for your comments are useless and
they sound like you only want to say something bad about btrfs.
Do you really mean that this is a mailing list where everybody has to
tell "it works!"?
The most mailing list where I'm subscribed mostly have threads starting
with "Houston, we've got a problem".
-----------------------------
By the way: I'm writing programs since more than 40 years, I know that
nearly every program contains errors which the programmer didn't wish or
expect. The programmer needs the reactions of the users.
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
