Am Donnerstag, 25. August 2011 schrieb Anand Jain: > anyways, solutions containing disk-write-cache disabled and SSD > is quite popular now a days. And in terms of random synchronous > write performance they are awesome.
There are SSD with capacitors such as Intel SSD 320. These according to the vendor should write out all remaining writes that made it to the disk cache should a power loss occur. I did not have any issues with BTRFS on / with a ThinkPad T520 and an Intel SSD 320. /home is still Ext4, as I want a fsck first. Thats with Linux 3.0.0-2 amd64 debian package. That said I also do not have any issues with BTRFS on a ThinkPad T23 for / and /home. But then the machine has an hibernate-to-disk-and-resume uptime of almost 120 days, so it didn´t see a power loss for a long time. Thats still with 2.6.38.4. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
