On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:01:22AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:23:52AM +1100, Chris Samuel wrote: > > On 05/01/12 09:11, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > > Looks to be reproducable. > > > > Does this happen with rc6 ? > > I haven't tried. All I'm doing is running some benchmarks to get > numbers for a talk I'm giving about improvements in XFS metadata > scalability, so I wanted to update my last set of numbers from > 2.6.39. > > As it was, these benchmarks also failed on btrfs with oopsen and > corruptions back in 2.6.39 time frame. e.g. same VM, same > test, different crashes, similar slowdowns as reported here: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/11062 > > Given that there is now a history of this simple test uncovering > problems, perhaps this is a test that should be run more regularly > by btrfs developers?
Unfortunately, this one works for me. I'll try it again and see if I can push harder. If not, I'll see if I can trade beer for some diagnostic runs. Thanks Dave -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
