On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 02:45:00PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:46:57PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:01:22AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:23:52AM +1100, Chris Samuel wrote: > > > > On 05/01/12 09:11, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > > > > > > Looks to be reproducable. > > > > > > > > Does this happen with rc6 ? > > > > > > I haven't tried. All I'm doing is running some benchmarks to get > > > numbers for a talk I'm giving about improvements in XFS metadata > > > scalability, so I wanted to update my last set of numbers from > > > 2.6.39. > > > > > > As it was, these benchmarks also failed on btrfs with oopsen and > > > corruptions back in 2.6.39 time frame. e.g. same VM, same > > > test, different crashes, similar slowdowns as reported here: > > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/11062 > > > > > > Given that there is now a history of this simple test uncovering > > > problems, perhaps this is a test that should be run more regularly > > > by btrfs developers? > > > > Unfortunately, this one works for me. I'll try it again and see if I > > can push harder. If not, I'll see if I can trade beer for some > > diagnostic runs. > > Aha, if I try it just on the ssd instead of on my full array it triggers > at 88M files. Great.
Good to know. The error that is generating the BUG on my machine is -28 (ENOSPC). Given there's 17TB free on my filesystem.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
