On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 03:00:31PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 04:31:04PM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> > +static int restriper_kthread(void *data)
>
> you've changed restripe -> balance in some places, I'm not sure if you
> want to distinguish them sometimes, like the kthread worker name here
>
> > +{
> ...
> > +}
> > +
> > +int btrfs_recover_balance(struct btrfs_root *tree_root)
> > +{
> ...
> > + btrfs_balance_data(leaf, item, &disk_bargs);
> > + btrfs_disk_balance_args_to_cpu(&bctl->data, &disk_bargs);
> > + btrfs_balance_meta(leaf, item, &disk_bargs);
> > + btrfs_disk_balance_args_to_cpu(&bctl->meta, &disk_bargs);
> > + btrfs_balance_sys(leaf, item, &disk_bargs);
> > + btrfs_disk_balance_args_to_cpu(&bctl->sys, &disk_bargs);
> > +
> > + tsk = kthread_run(restriper_kthread, bctl, "btrfs-restriper");
>
> or process name here.
>
> Nothing serious, I noticed this while diffing the previous version.
I'll change it to btrfs-balance and balance_kthread. Thanks for
reviewing!
Ilya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
