Am Montag, 19. März 2012 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:31:24AM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > > <formletter> > > > > > > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the > > > stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt > > > for how to do this properly. > > > > > > </formletter> > > > > What point of the rules do you refer to? Is it > > > > - It or an equivalent fix must already exist in Linus' tree (upstream). > > Yes. > > Without that, there's nothing I can do with this. > > > Or do you want the patch quoted in the mail? > > > > Anyways its not yet in linus tree AFAIR and from my side it was a > > question whether it should be included at all. I thought it might be > > good ccing you on that question already. > > It's nice, yes, but note that you sent this to me directly, didn't cc: > the proper stable mailing list so that others who maintain other stable > trees also didn't get the notice, and again, there's really nothing that > the stable maintainers can do about this at the moment.
I did, but got the address wrong, missed the vger in it. Anyway, I try to follow-up on this, when its in Linus tree (via git wait and notify for commit? - nah just kidding, but would be useful ;) Thanks, -- Martin Steigerwald - teamix GmbH - http://www.teamix.de gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
