On Fri, July 06, 2012 at 16:40 (+0200), Chris Mason wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 08:33:51AM -0600, Sami Liedes wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 12:42:50PM +0200, Jan Schmidt wrote:
>>> I've no good idea at the moment how to go on. It might help to get a 
>>> feeling if
>>> it's shifting around at least a little bit or really constant in the timing 
>>> of
>>> occurrence. So can you please apply the next patch on top of the other two 
>>> and
>>> give it some more failure tries? The "checksum mismatch [1234]" line will 
>>> be of
>>> most interest. I'm also curious what the additional debug variables will 
>>> say in
>>> the extended version of the very first printk. You can leave out the stack
>>> traces if you like, they won't matter much anyway.
>>
>> Ok. Also turned on CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC and CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON as
>> suggested by Chris Mason.
>>
>> With those and the latest patch, there's an oops already at boot. I
>> don't have netconsole yet at that point, but here's the important
>> parts (sure I can capture it fully if you need).
>>
>> By the way, something seems to be untabifying your patches. I don't
>> know if it's on my side or yours, but at least some other patches I
>> receive via linux-btrfs contain tabs. Doing a M-x tabify in emacs
>> mostly makes them apply cleanly for me.
>>
>>      Sami
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
>> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000150
>> IP: [<ffffffffa0223568>] check_node+0x138/0x250 [btrfs]
> 
> This isn't from any of the new debugging.  Can you please try it on an
> unpatched kernel?

You're confusing that with check_leaf. I added check_node along the way, see my
mail from Thu, July 05, 2012 at 15:41 (+0200). I'd really like to add something
similar for the 3.6 series.

Checking for the null pointer dereference.

-Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to