[Retry: I think this mail didn't make it to the list, probably because of the 73 kilobyte attached log. Here's a URL to the file:]
http://www.niksula.hut.fi/~sliedes/btrfs-scrub-debug.log.gz Sami ------------------------------------------------------------ On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 05:09:00PM +0200, Jan Schmidt wrote: > Oh I see. root->node can be NULL during mount. Please add this on top: Ok. So, ran it with DEBUG_PAGEALLOC and slub debugging on. This time it took half an hour to crash, and there's _lots_ of checksum mismatch [234] messages even before the crash. gzipped dmesg attached. At 781 seconds there's an "irq 17: nobody cared". That's a known bug with this (and other Asus) motherboards and happens every now and then. I doubt it has anything to do with this. I think I might try running it overnight with KMEMCHECK to see if it reports something. But for now, what there's in the log: * lots of checksum mismatch [234], no 1s * a fair number of "csum_tree_block: [0-9]+ callbacks suppressed" lines * two "btrfs: node seems invalid now. checksum ok = 1" messages, one at 1499 seconds and another just before the crash at 1973 * Just before the crash: btrfs: invalid parameters for read_extent_buffer: start (32771) > eb->len (32768). eb start is 2261163409408, level 100, generation 4412718571037421157, nritems 538968254. len param 17. debug 2/989/538968254/4412718571037421157/0x0/0/0x0/0x0 * the oopses > > By the way, something seems to be untabifying your patches. I don't > > know if it's on my side or yours, but at least some other patches I > > receive via linux-btrfs contain tabs. Doing a M-x tabify in emacs > > mostly makes them apply cleanly for me. > > Oh, I'm sorry. Should have been on my side. I hope it's better with the > current > diff? Yes. No problem :) [See attachment for dmesg log.] Sami -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html