On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:36:52PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 03:09:53PM -0700, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > > The same is true for the debian package, but are these used in Fedora ? > > > For backwards compat, could those be turned into shell scripts which > > > invoke the btrfs tool? > > > > I don't see any gain to maintains a script bash (which has to be written > > from scratch) instead of maintains the current C code. > > > > These programs were deprecated two years ago [1]. If some distribution > > need them, could maintain them as separate patch. But I think that the > > mainstream should remove. > > I'd say that if SuSE or oracle depend on them we keep them. Otherwise, > I'm fine with removing them or just making the 3 line bash script.
I wanted to remove them once from our packages, but some tool uses them. I'm fine with replacing them with a shellscript, this is just a syntactic conversion from btrfsctl style to the subcommands. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
