Sorry, but the bug persists even with the above patch.
touch test
chattr +C test
lsattr test
mv test test2
lsattr test2
In the above scenario test2 will not have the C flag.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Liu Bo <bo.li....@oracle.com> wrote:
> A user reported some weird behaviours,
> if we move a file with the noCow flag to a directory without the
> noCow flag, the file is now without the flag, but after remount,
> we'll find the file's noCow flag comes back.
>
> This is because we missed a proper inode update after inheriting
> parent directory's flags,
>
> Reported-by: Marios Titas <redneb8...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li....@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index d9984fa..d2e3352 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -7478,8 +7478,6 @@ static int btrfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct
> dentry *old_dentry,
> old_dentry->d_inode,
> old_dentry->d_name.name,
> old_dentry->d_name.len);
> - if (!ret)
> - ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, old_inode);
> }
> if (ret) {
> btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret);
> @@ -7514,6 +7512,11 @@ static int btrfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct
> dentry *old_dentry,
> }
>
> fixup_inode_flags(new_dir, old_inode);
> + ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, old_inode);
> + if (ret) {
> + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret);
> + goto out_fail;
> + }
>
> ret = btrfs_add_link(trans, new_dir, old_inode,
> new_dentry->d_name.name,
> --
> 1.7.7.6
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
