On      fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:40:35 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:32:50AM -0500, Marios Titas wrote:
>> Sorry, but the bug persists even with the above patch.
>>
>> touch test
>> chattr +C test
>> lsattr test
>> mv test test2
>> lsattr test2
>>
>> In the above scenario test2 will not have the C flag.
> 
> What do you expect?  IMO it's right that test2 does not have the C flag.

No, it's not right.
For the users, they expect the C flag is not lost because they just do
a rename operation. but fixup_inode_flags() re-sets the flags by the
parent directory's flag.

I think we should inherit the flags from the parent just when we create
a new file/directory, in the other cases, just give a option to the users.
How do you think about?

Thanks
Miao

> 
> This patch ensure that we get the same result after we remount, no more
> the C flag coming back :)
> 
> thanks,
> liubo
> 
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Liu Bo <bo.li....@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> A user reported some weird behaviours,
>>> if we move a file with the noCow flag to a directory without the
>>> noCow flag, the file is now without the flag, but after remount,
>>> we'll find the file's noCow flag comes back.
>>>
>>> This is because we missed a proper inode update after inheriting
>>> parent directory's flags,
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Marios Titas <redneb8...@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li....@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>>  fs/btrfs/inode.c |    7 +++++--
>>>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>>> index d9984fa..d2e3352 100644
>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>>> @@ -7478,8 +7478,6 @@ static int btrfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct 
>>> dentry *old_dentry,
>>>                                         old_dentry->d_inode,
>>>                                         old_dentry->d_name.name,
>>>                                         old_dentry->d_name.len);
>>> -               if (!ret)
>>> -                       ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, old_inode);
>>>         }
>>>         if (ret) {
>>>                 btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret);
>>> @@ -7514,6 +7512,11 @@ static int btrfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, 
>>> struct dentry *old_dentry,
>>>         }
>>>
>>>         fixup_inode_flags(new_dir, old_inode);
>>> +       ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, old_inode);
>>> +       if (ret) {
>>> +               btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret);
>>> +               goto out_fail;
>>> +       }
>>>
>>>         ret = btrfs_add_link(trans, new_dir, old_inode,
>>>                              new_dentry->d_name.name,
>>> --
>>> 1.7.7.6
>>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to