On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Martin Steigerwald <mar...@lichtvoll.de> wrote: > I´d still like that for df, whose output is quite bogus in certain BTRFS > setups at the moment and does not give applications a realistic estimate at > all. One example is raid 1 with 10 GB each disk. Shows 20 GB free. An > application which wants to write 15 GB will fail. Which can break installer > scripts, package management, cache software or anything else which checks > for free space. Thus I´d like df to default to *minimum* free.
Is that any better than the script failing to attempt to install because it needs 15G but because some of the storage is used in RAID1 then df shows 10G free but the 15G install would work fine. If you could force the tool to install where it know it doesn't have sufficient space? -- Gareth Pye Level 2 Judge, Melbourne, Australia Australian MTG Forum: mtgau.com gar...@cerberos.id.au - www.rockpaperdynamite.wordpress.com "Dear God, I would like to file a bug report" -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
