On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 07:56:41AM -0600, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> Hi Josef,
> Am 22.03.2013 14:53, schrieb Josef Bacik:
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 06:11:56AM -0600, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG 
> > wrote:
> >> Hi Chris,
> >>
> >>>>>>> Which kernel are you running?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -chris
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> vanilla 3.8.3.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ok, with the 3.9 merge window Josef changed how we do the reservations.
> >>>>> Are you able to try a slightly more experimental kernel?
> >>
> >> any ideas what i can check? 3.9-rc3 gives me same results.
> >>
> > 
> > Sorry Stefan I'm almost done with what I'm working on and then I'll work up 
> > a
> > patch for you to run so I can narrow down what's going on.  Thanks,
> 
> Great!
> 
> Thanks - just wanted to know that it's not my fault. I'm happy to test
> the patch and provide feedback.
> 

Ok I think we are way over-reserving for rename, can you give this patch a whirl
and see what happens?  If it still fails can you capture dmesg and reply with
that so I can see what's going on.  Thanks,

Josef


diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 9ac2eca..aabaea6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -4161,6 +4161,11 @@ out:
                        ret = 0;
        }
        if (flushing) {
+               if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
+                       printk(KERN_ERR "returning enospc, dumping space 
info\n");
+                       dump_space_info(space_info, 0, 0);
+               }
+
                spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
                space_info->flush = 0;
                wake_up_all(&space_info->wait);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index ca1b767..3980ae7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -3679,11 +3679,9 @@ static struct btrfs_trans_handle 
*__unlink_start_trans(struct inode *dir,
         * 1 for the dir item
         * 1 for the dir index
         * 1 for the inode ref
-        * 1 for the inode ref in the tree log
-        * 2 for the dir entries in the log
         * 1 for the inode
         */
-       trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 8);
+       trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 5);
        if (!IS_ERR(trans) || PTR_ERR(trans) != -ENOSPC)
                return trans;
 
@@ -8127,7 +8125,7 @@ static int btrfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct 
dentry *old_dentry,
         * inodes.  So 5 * 2 is 10, plus 1 for the new link, so 11 total items
         * should cover the worst case number of items we'll modify.
         */
-       trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 20);
+       trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 11);
        if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
                 ret = PTR_ERR(trans);
                 goto out_notrans;
-- 
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to