On Tue, April 16, 2013 at 12:08 (+0200), Wang Shilong wrote: > Hello Jan, > > >> slot = path->slots[0]; >> ptr = btrfs_item_ptr(l, slot, struct btrfs_qgroup_status_item); >> + spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock); > > > Why we need hold qgroup_lock here? would you please explain...
It would have been easier for me if you had left the relevant context in there, but I finally found it. Thinking again about it, as update_qgroup_status_item is only called from transaction commit context, we can do without a spinlock here. I meant to protect fs_info->qgroup_flags and fs_info->qgroup_rescan_progress, but it seems not required. Thanks, -Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
