1. It's md-raid, with an lvm on top, and this is running in a virtual machine
with lvm also enabled.
2. Originally, I was working from the Arch LiveCD, but I later created another
disk to install ArchBang to.
3. I'm waiting for the check to complete.
4. SMART comes up clean
smartctl -x /dev/sdg | grep SCT
SCT capabilities: (0x003d) SCT Status supported.
SCT Error Recovery Control supported.
SCT Feature Control supported.
SCT Data Table supported.
GP/S Log at address 0xe0 has 1 sectors [SCT Command/Status]
GP/S Log at address 0xe1 has 1 sectors [SCT Data Transfer]
SCT Status Version: 3
SCT Version (vendor specific): 256 (0x0100)
SCT Support Level: 1
SCT Temperature History Version: 2
SCT Error Recovery Control:
5. It returns a value of 30.
I'm running chunk-recover, but I'm going to let it write anything. I figure
it'll take a while for it to scan, given the large size of the drive.
On 22.08.2013, at 18:58, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:
> Non-expert on btrfs errors, so hopefully someone else will still reply with
> recovery advice. I have some foundational questions on the setup that may
> relate, if you don't already know what precipitated this failure:
>
>
> 1.
> You said it's md raid5, but I see /dev/mapper/main--storage--vg-root and dm-1
> or dm-2, so I wonder if this is md raid with LVM on top; or if this is LVM
> raid5 (which directly implements raid5 at LV level, without mdadm, but does
> use md code underneath)?
>
> 2.
> In one dmesg I see /dev/dm-2 referenced with errors, and in another
> /dev/dm-1. Is it actually the same btrfs volume, and if so I wonder why it's
> sometimes being mapped to a difference dm device?
>
> 3.
> If it's an md device, when was the last time a scrub check was run?
> echo check > /sys/block/mdX/md/sync_action
> then after that completes:
> cat /sys/block/mdX/mismatch_cnt
>
> Or if LVM raid5, I think this is only recently added:
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/lvm-devel/2013-April/msg00042.html
>
> 4.
> smartctl -x for each drive; are there any indications of reallocated sectors,
> pending sectors, bad block, ECC error, CRC or UDMA error? Also included in
> the above command should return the SCT Error Recovery Control value for each
> drive, what's that value?
>
> 5.
> What is returned for any one of the drives:
>
> cat /sys/block/sdX/device/timeout
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris Murphy
>
>
> On Aug 22, 2013, at 1:38 PM, Nicholas Lee <em...@nickle.es> wrote:
>
>> Full pastebin here: http://cwillu.com:8080/96.245.194.45#6
>>
>> [ 9.213212] Btrfs loaded
>> [ 9.245673] device fsid 2ffb2450-f74f-4cfb-a3be-bb5e3c6d32ec devid 1
>> transid 23568 /dev/dm-1
>> [ 102.886834] device fsid 2ffb2450-f74f-4cfb-a3be-bb5e3c6d32ec devid 1
>> transid 23568 /dev/mapper/main--storage--vg-root
>> [ 102.888348] btrfs: enabling auto recovery
>> [ 102.888354] btrfs: disabling disk space caching
>> [ 102.888357] btrfs: disabling disk space caching
>> [ 102.911068] BTRFS critical (device dm-1): unable to find logical
>> 1781900460032 len 4096
>> [ 102.911103] BTRFS emergency (device dm-1): No mapping for
>> 1781900460032-1781900464128
>>
>> [ 102.911108] btrfs: failed to read tree root on dm-1
>> [ 102.911186] BTRFS critical (device dm-1): unable to find logical
>> 1781900460032 len 4096
>> [ 102.911217] BTRFS emergency (device dm-1): No mapping for
>> 1781900460032-1781900464128
>>
>> [ 102.911222] btrfs: failed to read tree root on dm-1
>> [ 102.911235] BTRFS critical (device dm-1): unable to find logical
>> 1198824710144 len 4096
>> [ 102.911240] BTRFS emergency (device dm-1): No mapping for
>> 1198824710144-1198824714240
>>
>> [ 102.911243] btrfs: failed to read tree root on dm-1
>> [ 102.911255] BTRFS critical (device dm-1): unable to find logical
>> 1198518919168 len 4096
>> [ 102.911286] BTRFS emergency (device dm-1): No mapping for
>> 1198518919168-1198518923264
>>
>> [ 102.911290] btrfs: failed to read tree root on dm-1
>> [ 102.911302] BTRFS critical (device dm-1): unable to find logical
>> 582755782656 len 4096
>> [ 102.911308] BTRFS emergency (device dm-1): No mapping for
>> 582755782656-582755786752
>>
>> [ 102.911311] btrfs: failed to read tree root on dm-1
>> [ 102.986797] btrfs: open_ctree failed
>>
>>
>> On 22.08.2013, at 15:23, Nicholas Lee <em...@nickle.es> wrote:
>>
>>> After updating the kernel and using btrfs-progs-git from the AUR, I'm now
>>> getting this output. Does this yield any new insight?
>>>
>>> [ 473.305408] btrfs: failed to read tree root on dm-2
>>> [ 473.305555] BTRFS critical (device dm-2): unable to find logical
>>> 1781900460032 len 4096
>>> [ 473.305591] BTRFS emergency (device dm-2): No mapping for
>>> 1781900460032-1781900464128
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22.08.2013, at 10:09, Mitch Harder <mitch.har...@sabayonlinux.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Nicholas Lee <em...@nickle.es> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> [ 45.914275] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>>> [ 45.914406] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4417!
>>>>> [ 45.914489] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>>>>
>>>> I can't say if this will fix your problem or not, but the 3.10.x
>>>> kernel has a patch to pass this error back instead of halting with a
>>>> BUG() at this point.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> Chris Murphy
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
