On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 02:22:55AM +0100, Kai Krakow wrote: > These thought are actually quite interesting. So you are saying that data > may not be fully written to SSD although the kernel thinks so? This is
That, and worse. Incidently, I have just posted on my G+ about this: https://plus.google.com/106981743284611658289/posts/Us8yjK9SPs6 which is mostly links to http://lkcl.net/reports/ssd_analysis.html https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast13/understanding-robustness-ssds-under-power-fault After you read those, you'll never think twice about SSDs and data loss anymore :-/ (I kind of found that out myself over time too, but these have much more data than I got myself empirically on a couple of SSDs) Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems .... .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | PGP 1024R/763BE901 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
