On 02/14/2014 07:11 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:57:03 +0100 > Goffredo Baroncelli <kreij...@libero.it> wrote: > >> On 02/13/2014 10:00 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote: >>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:49:08 +0100 >>> Goffredo Baroncelli <kreij...@libero.it> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for the comments, however I don't like du not usage; but you are >>>> right >>>> when you don't like "disk-usage". What about "btrfs filesystem >>>> chunk-usage" ? >>> >>> Personally I don't see the point of being super-pedantic here, i.e. "look >>> this >>> is not just filesystem usage, this is filesystem CHUNK usage"... Consistency >>> of having a matching "dev usage" and "fi usage" would have been nicer. >> >> >> What about "btrfs filesystem chunk-usage" ? > > Uhm? Had to reread this several times, but it looks like you're repeating > exactly the same question that I was already answering in the quoted part. > > To clarify even more, personally I'd like if there would have been "btrfs dev > usage" and "btrfs fi usage". Do not see the need to specifically make the 2nd > one "chunk-usage" instead of simply "usage".
I don't like "usage" because it to me seems to be too much generic. Because both "btrfs filesystem disk-usage" and "btrfs device disk-usage" report about chunk (and/or block group) infos, I am investigating about - btrfs filesystem chunk-usage - btrfs device chunk-usage Regards GB -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
