On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 07:09:55PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > I have to agree with Chris: looking at the output of "btrfs fi disk-usage" > > $ sudo ./btrfs filesystem disk-usage -t /mnt/btrfs1/ > Data Data Metadata Metadata System System > Single RAID6 Single RAID5 Single RAID5 Unallocated > > /dev/vdb 8.00MB 1.00GB 8.00MB 1.00GB 4.00MB 4.00MB 97.98GB > /dev/vdc - 1.00GB - 1.00GB - 4.00MB 98.00GB > /dev/vdd - 1.00GB - 1.00GB - 4.00MB 98.00GB > /dev/vde - 1.00GB - 1.00GB - 4.00MB 98.00GB > ====== ======= ======== ======== ====== ======= =========== > Total 8.00MB 2.00GB 8.00MB 3.00GB 4.00MB 12.00MB 391.97GB > Used 0.00 11.25MB 0.00 36.00KB 0.00 4.00KB > > it is hard to tell that this can be named "filesystem usage". I think that > "details" or "examine" is a better name. > > Regarding "btrfs device usage", it seems to me more coherent. But as > reported before consistency also matters, so now I am inclined to use > "detail" (or examine) also for "btrfs device"
I'm for 'btrfs filesystem usage' and 'btrfs device usage', IMHO intuitive, easy to type and remember. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
