On 26/08/2014 22:53, Chris Mason wrote:
On 08/26/2014 10:51 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 8/26/14, 5:55 AM, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 08:08:57PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Of course I (we) don't care cdrom and/or floppy, but this raises
the question: are there other block devices which aren't showed in
proc/partitions ?

cdrom appears as /dev/sr0, floppy is /dev/fd0 if the respective modules
are loaded, no breakage here.

I am thinking to some less common hardware like
NON USB sd disk (I saw this kind of hardware, but now I don't have
it in my hands....).

A block device whose driver calls register_blkdev should appear in
proc/partitions, if not then I think it's a bug or a very non-standard
interface.

I don't know about any other cases where full /dev scan would reveal
something that /proc/partitions not, so I guess it's safe to remove it.

Yesterday, Chris did mention <something something mumble> about /dev/mapper/*

[12:57]  <cmason> I got inconsistent results from /proc/partitions
[12:57]  <cmason> this was 3 years ago now
[12:58]  <cmason> it didn't find everything for dm devices, yeah
[12:58]  <cmason> especially dm multipath got really confused

and I'll be honest, I didn't test with devicemapper devices, much
less dm multipath, so I suppose that's warranted prior to removal.

I'll see what I can do.

If there's a problem, I bet there's a solution that doesn't involve
scanning everything under /dev ...

That's definitely the problem I hit, but it was years ago.  I'm willing
to bet we're safe to keep /proc/partitions now.

 I was tempted to remove BTRFS_SCAN_PROC completely when I introduced
 BTRFS_SCAN_LBLKID, but then there was less clarity on this as it is
 now.

 The point I am trying to make is that we could remove BTRFS_SCAN_PROC
 all together and keep only the BTRFS_SCAN_LBLKID.
 (Which means we shall remove the -d option under btrfs filesystem
 show and btrfs device scan).

 We could remove scanning /proc/partition (the BTRFS_SCAN_PROC)
 because the libblkid (under scan method BTRFS_SCAN_LBLKID) would scan
 both udev and /proc/partition by default. (as in the libblkid
 man page). Further libblkid is end user configurable. end user can
 override the default configuration and can scan either of udev
 /dev/disk/by-* symlinks or /proc/partitions only.

 Further if still some device is not found then it would be a libblkid
 bug/enhancement, so we need to fix it under libblkid.

 The scan method BTRFS_SCAN_PROC is redundant.

Thanks, Anand


-chris

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to