> > Hello, > >> >> I have a well tested and working fine Centos5-Xen system. Accumulated cruft >> from various development efforts make it desirable to redo the install. >> Currently a RAID-10 ext4 filesystem with LVM and 750G of storage. There's a >> hot spare 750 drive in the system. >> >> I'm thinking of migrating the web sites (almost the only use of the server) >> to a spare then installing Centos-7 and btrfs, then migrating the sites back. >> >> I see RH marks btrfs in C7 as a technology preview but don't understand what >> that implies for future support and a suitably stable basis for storage. >> >> The demand on the system is low and not likely to change in the near future, >> storage access speeds are not likely to be dealbreakers and it would be nice >> to not need to use LVM, btrfs seems to have a better feature set and more >> intuitive command set. But I'm uncertain about stability. Anyone have an >> opinion? >> > > I used CentOS7 btrfs myself, just doing some tests..it crashed easily. > I don’t know how much efforts that Redhat do on btrfs for 7 series.
Maybe use SUSE enterprise for btrfs will be a better choice, they offered better support for btrfs as far as i know. > > >> Dave >> >> -- >> "As long as politics is the shadow cast on society by big business, >> the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance." >> >> -- John Dewey >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in >> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Best Regards, > Wang Shilong > Best Regards, Wang Shilong -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
