On 03/03/2015 06:18 AM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
On 02/26/2015 02:05 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
Wait a minute, this patch seems not working well in accounting quota
number when
deleting data shared by different subvolumes.
I will investigate more about it and send a V2 out.
I have sent a fstest
[PATCH] fstest: btrfs: add a test for quota number when deleting a
subvol.
for this problem I was trying to solve in this patch.
Please consider reverting the two commits introduced the problem:
e339a6b0 (Btrfs: __btrfs_mod_ref should always use no_quota)
1152651a (btrfs: qgroup: account shared subtrees during snapshot delete)
We aren't reverting these two commits, what we had was worse before than
it is now. We need to figure out why this is resulting in problems and
fix that rather than throwing out a whole bunch of work. Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
