On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 09:00:36AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On 03/03/2015 06:18 AM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
>> On 02/26/2015 02:05 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
>>> Wait a minute, this patch seems not working well in accounting quota
>>> number when
>>> deleting data shared by different subvolumes.
>>>
>>> I will investigate more about it and send a V2 out.
>> I have sent a fstest
>> [PATCH] fstest: btrfs: add a test for quota number when deleting a
>> subvol.
>> for this problem I was trying to solve in this patch.
>>
>> Please consider reverting the two commits introduced the problem:
>>
>> e339a6b0 (Btrfs: __btrfs_mod_ref should always use no_quota)
>> 1152651a (btrfs: qgroup: account shared subtrees during snapshot delete)
>>
>
> We aren't reverting these two commits, what we had was worse before than it
> is now. We need to figure out why this is resulting in problems and fix
> that rather than throwing out a whole bunch of work. Thanks,
Agreed, reverting these would re-introduce far more problems than it would
solve.
--Mark
--
Mark Fasheh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
