cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > Lionel Bouton <lionel+c...@bouton.name> wrote: > > > Le 10/10/2015 18:55, cov...@ccs.covici.com a écrit : > > > [...] > > > But do you folks have any idea about my original question, this leads me > > > to think that btrfs is too new or something. > > > > I've seen a recent report of a problem with btrfs-progs 4.2 confirmed as > > a bug in mkfs. As you created the filesystem with it, it could be the > > problem. > > Note that btrfs-progs 4.2 is marked ~amd64 on Gentoo: when you live on > > the bleeding edge you shouldn't be surprised to bleed sometimes ;-) > > > > You might have more luck by better describing the errors. Your title > > mentions lots of errors, but there's only one log extract in a zip file > > for a filesystem being mounted and it's only a warning about lock > > contention which from an educated guess seems unlikely to make programs > > crash. > > I'm not familiar with the 203 exit codes you mention. This seems a > > systemd thing with unclear meaning from a quick Google search so it > > isn't really helpful unless there are kernel oops or panics for these > > errors too. > > These errors are not kernel panicks, they are just that systemd units > are not starting and the programs that are executed in the unit files > are returning these errors such as the 203 with no other explanation. I > tried for instance to run /usr/bin/postgresql-9.4-check-db-dir and it > said that postgresql.conf was missing, but I could do an ls on that file > and got the name. I think I have more like that, but no kernel errors > and scrub has no errors. Should I go back to an earlier btrfs progs > and, if so, which one?
I do have 4.2.2, I could go to, would that be better? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
