On 10/09/2015 07:15 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 08/10/15 02:40, Neil Brown wrote:
>> Anna Schumaker <anna.schuma...@netapp.com> writes:
>>
>>> @@ -1338,34 +1362,26 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in,
>>> loff_t pos_in,
>>> struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
>>> size_t len, unsigned int flags)
>>> {
>>> - struct inode *inode_in;
>>> - struct inode *inode_out;
>>> ssize_t ret;
>>>
>>> - if (flags)
>>> + /* Flags should only be used exclusively. */
>>> + if ((flags & COPY_FR_COPY) && (flags & ~COPY_FR_COPY))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + if ((flags & COPY_FR_REFLINK) && (flags & ~COPY_FR_REFLINK))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + if ((flags & COPY_FR_DEDUP) && (flags & ~COPY_FR_DEDUP))
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>
>> Do you also need:
>>
>> if (flags & ~(COPY_FR_COPY | COPY_FR_REFLINK | COPY_FR_DEDUP))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> so that future user-space can test if the kernel supports new flags?
>
> Seems like a good idea, yes.
>
> Also that got me thinking about COPY_FR_SPARSE.
> What's the current behavior when copying a sparse range?
> Is the hole propagated by default (good), or is it expanded?
I haven't tried it, but I think the hole would be expanded :(. I'm having
splice() handle the pagecache copy part, and (as far as I know) splice()
doesn't know anything about sparse files. I might be able to put in some kind
of fallocate() / splice() loop to copy the range in multiple pieces.
I don't want to add COPY_FR_SPARSE_AUTO, because then the kernel will have to
determine how best to interpret "auto". I'm more inclined to add a single
COPY_FR_SPARSE flag to enable creating sparse files, and then have the
application tell us what to do for any given range.
Anna
>
> Note cp(1) has --sparse={never,auto,always}. Auto is the default,
> so it would be good I think if that was the default mode for
> copy_file_range().
> With other sparse modes, we'd have to avoid copy_file_range() unless
> there was control possible with COPY_FR_SPARSE_{AUTO,NONE,ALWAYS}.
> Note currently cp --sparse=always will detect runs of zeros and also
> avoid speculative preallocation by using fallocate (fd, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE,
> ...)
>
> thanks,
> Pádraig.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
