On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer <[email protected]> wrote:
> If there would be e.g. an kept-up-to-date wiki page about the status > and current perils of e.g. RAID5/6, people (like me) wouldn't ask every > weeks, saving the devs' time. Well up until 4.6, there was a rather clear "Btrfs is under heavy development, and is not suitable for-any uses other than benchmarking and review." statement in kernel documentation. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/diff/Documentation/filesystems/btrfs.txt?id=v4.6&id2=v4.5 There's no longer such a strongly worded caution in that document, nor in the wiki. The wiki has stale information still, but it's a volunteer effort like everything else Btrfs related. -- Chris Murphy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
