The original problem from 2 days ago just happened again. I ran btrfs
rescue zero-log (again) and the root filesystem mounted but it was
read-only on first boot. I rebooted again and everything seems normal.
But clearly there is a problem that needs to be resolved.

Problem:
The root file system becomes read-only during normal usage. See copied
message below for more information about the error.

I'm happy to provide more info upon request. I appreciate any help. Is
this btrfs? A bad disk? Something else?

Linux x99 4.6.4-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Jul 11 19:12:32 CEST 2016
x86_64 GNU/Linux

btrfs-progs v4.6.1


On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Dave T <davestechs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My system locked up with btrfs-transaction consuming 100% CPU and NMI
> watchdog reporting BUG: soft lockup with btrfs-transaction:314.
>
> This comes 2 days after a serious event involving BTRFS where my
> system would not mount the root fs. (I gave details in an email to the
> list two days ago and copied again below.)
>
> Here are full details of todays "bug" (or whatever it was).
>
> When i left work last night I left my system running and I locked the
> session. The only things open were KDE Plasma, some terminal windows
> and some plain text documents in Kate editor. No real work was running
> on the local machine.
>
> This morning I came to work and noticed that my computer was slightly
> warm and the fans were running at higher than normal RPM.
>
> I logged in and opened top in an existing terminal. I saw that
> btrfs-transaction was consuming 100% of a CPU core and kworker was
> consumer 100% of another CPU core.
>
> I tried to run a command (to view logs) in another terminal window,
> but the system became unresponsive. I was able to switch to another
> virtual console, but it was very slow. I took photos with my phone.
> See link below for two images (top and virtual console):
>
> http://imgur.com/a/fT1RV
>
> These photos show what I reported above:
> * btrfs-transaction consuming 100% CPU
> * NMI watchdog reporting BUG: soft lockup with btrfs-transaction:314
>
> I hard reset my system, expecting the worst, but it rebooted normally.
> journalctl -xb -p3 showed no entries.
>
> Obviously I have a serious problem. However, I have no clue about what
> the problem might be (except that it seemingly involves btrfs). What
> other information can I provide?
>
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Dave <davestechs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am running Arch Linux on a system with full disk encryption and the
>> storage is a Samsung 950 Pro NVMe drive (512 GB). The computer is a
>> couple months old. No bad behavior until now. (I'm only using 21 GB of
>> the 512 space on the disk.)
>>
>>     btrfs-progs v4.5.1
>>
>> Today I was using my system normally and browsing the web. Firefox
>> stopped responding suddenly and for no apparent reason. Then (KDE)
>> Plasma stopped responding. I could not log out of KDE.
>>
>> I killed my user session (pkill -u me), then I tired to startx. At
>> that point I noticed my root filesystem was read-only.
>>
>> As a first step, I rebooted. That didn't help anything. I tried
>> rebooting several more times -- no change.
>>
>> The root filesystem (btrfs) would not mount. (See error below.) I
>> booted into a LiveUSB environment and ran this command:
>>
>>     cryptsetup open --type luks /dev/xxx cryptroot
>>
>> It opens. Then I ran:
>>
>>     mount -t btrfs -o
>> noatime,nodiratime,ssd,compress=lzo,defaults,space_cache,subvolid=257
>> /dev/mapper/cryptroot /mnt
>>
>> The error message is shown here:
>>
>>     [ 2300.967048] BTRFS info (device dm-0): use ssd allocation scheme
>>     [ 2300.967058] BTRFS info (device dm-0): use lzo compression
>>     [ 2300.967066] BTRFS info (device dm-0): disk space caching is enabled
>>     [ 2300.967069] BTRFS: has skinny extents
>>     [ 2300.995393] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in
>> btrfs_replay_log:2413: errno=-22 unknown (Failed to recover log tree)
>>     [ 2300.997617] BTRFS info (device dm-0): delayed_refs has NO entry
>>     [ 2300.997673] BTRFS error (device dm-0): cleaner transaction
>> attach returned -30
>>     [ 2301.035405] BTRFS: open_ctree failed
>>
>> It is exactly the same error I saw when trying to boot normally as
>> mentioned above.
>>
>> Based on these two links:
>>
>>> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Problem_FAQ
>>> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs-zero-log
>>
>> I decided to take a chance on running this command:
>>
>>     btrfs rescue zero-log
>>
>> That worked and I can mount the filesystem.
>>
>> I ran btrfs check --repair. Here is the output:
>>
>>     root@broken / # umount /mnt
>>     root@broken / # btrfs check --repair /dev/mapper/cryptroot
>>     enabling repair mode
>>     Checking filesystem on /dev/mapper/cryptroot
>>     checking extents
>>     bad metadata [292414476288, 292414492672) crossing stripe boundary
>>     bad metadata [292414541824, 292414558208) crossing stripe boundary
>>     bad metadata [292414672896, 292414689280) crossing stripe boundary
>>     bad metadata [292414869504, 292414885888) crossing stripe boundary
>>     bad metadata [292415000576, 292415016960) crossing stripe boundary
>>     bad metadata [292415066112, 292415082496) crossing stripe boundary
>>     bad metadata [292415131648, 292415148032) crossing stripe boundary
>>     bad metadata [292415262720, 292415279104) crossing stripe boundary
>>     bad metadata [292415328256, 292415344640) crossing stripe boundary
>>     bad metadata [292415393792, 292415410176) crossing stripe boundary
>>     repaired damaged extent references
>>     Fixed 0 roots.
>>     checking free space cache
>>     cache and super generation don't match, space cache will be invalidated
>>     checking fs roots
>>     checking csums
>>     checking root refs
>>     checking quota groups
>>     Ignoring qgroup relation key 258
>>     Ignoring qgroup relation key 263
>>     Ignoring qgroup relation key 71776119061217538
>>     Ignoring qgroup relation key 71776119061217543
>>     Counts for qgroup id: 257 are different
>>     our:            referenced 10412273664 referenced compressed 10412273664
>>     disk:           referenced 10411311104 referenced compressed 10411311104
>>     diff:           referenced 962560 referenced compressed 962560
>>     our:            exclusive 10412273664 exclusive compressed 10412273664
>>     disk:           exclusive 10412273664 exclusive compressed 10412273664
>>     found 21570773057 bytes used err is 0
>>     total csum bytes: 19563456
>>     total tree bytes: 403767296
>>     total fs tree bytes: 349667328
>>     total extent tree bytes: 27328512
>>     btree space waste bytes: 66313360
>>     file data blocks allocated: 39882014720
>>     referenced 28043988992
>>     extent buffer leak: start 20987904 len 16384
>>     extent buffer leak: start 292688068608 len 16384
>>     extent buffer leak: start 60915712 len 16384
>>     extent buffer leak: start 29569581056 len 16384
>>     extent buffer leak: start 29569597440 len 16384
>>     extent buffer leak: start 292412063744 len 16384
>>     extent buffer leak: start 292405870592 len 16384
>>     extent buffer leak: start 292405936128 len 16384
>>     extent buffer leak: start 292413964288 len 16384
>>
>> Then I check dmesg and I see this error information:
>>
>>     [ 4925.562422] BTRFS info (device dm-0): use ssd allocation scheme
>>     [ 4925.562432] BTRFS info (device dm-0): use lzo compression
>>     [ 4925.562440] BTRFS info (device dm-0): disk space caching is enabled
>>     [ 4925.562444] BTRFS: has skinny extents
>>     [ 4925.578705] BTRFS error (device dm-0): qgroup generation
>> mismatch, marked as inconsistent
>>     [ 4925.584033] BTRFS: checking UUID tree
>>
>> What should I do next? I'm a simple user.
>>
>> I already ran memtest86+ overnight using 8 CPU cores in parallel (so
>> it was a very thorough memory test). There were 0 RAM errors.
>>
>> I previously used btrfs since 2012 with no issues. I am concerned
>> about the present issue because I do not understand the cause.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to