Hi
On 08/18/2016 01:00 AM, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:08:12PM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote:
This patchset implements check fs trees in low memory mode, and fix the
return value bug of the function cmd_check().
Lu Fengqi (13):
btrfs-progs: move btrfs_extref_hash() to hash.h
btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to find dir_item
btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check inode_ref
btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check inode_extref
btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to find inode_ref
btrfs-progs: check: introduce a function to check dir_item
btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check file extent
btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check inode item
btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check fs root
btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check root ref
btrfs-progs: check: introduce low_memory mode fs_tree check
btrfs-progs: check: fix the return value bug of cmd_check()
btrfs-progs: check: fix false warning for check_extent_item()
FYI, I'm going to promote this series within devel and schedule it for
the next release. The preparatory subset will be merged, but I might do
some modificaions to the command line interface.
In current low memory fs trees check, it dose not check whether
node or leaf is shared, which will casue btrfsck much slower when
fs has one or more snapshots. I have prepared a patch to improve
this issue, if you have some free time, please check it, thanks.
And this patch is based on my previous patch "btrfs-progs: eliminate
some unnecessary
btrfs_lookup_extent_info() calls in walk_down_tree()".
Regards,
Xiaoguang Wang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
