On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 05:57:44PM +0800, Wang Xiaoguang wrote: > Hi > > On 08/18/2016 01:00 AM, David Sterba wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:08:12PM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote: > >> This patchset implements check fs trees in low memory mode, and fix the > >> return value bug of the function cmd_check(). > >> > >> Lu Fengqi (13): > >> btrfs-progs: move btrfs_extref_hash() to hash.h > >> btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to find dir_item > >> btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check inode_ref > >> btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check inode_extref > >> btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to find inode_ref > >> btrfs-progs: check: introduce a function to check dir_item > >> btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check file extent > >> btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check inode item > >> btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check fs root > >> btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check root ref > >> btrfs-progs: check: introduce low_memory mode fs_tree check > >> btrfs-progs: check: fix the return value bug of cmd_check() > >> btrfs-progs: check: fix false warning for check_extent_item() > > FYI, I'm going to promote this series within devel and schedule it for > > the next release. The preparatory subset will be merged, but I might do > > some modificaions to the command line interface. > In current low memory fs trees check, it dose not check whether > node or leaf is shared, which will casue btrfsck much slower when > fs has one or more snapshots. I have prepared a patch to improve > this issue, if you have some free time, please check it, thanks.
The low-memory mode has an experimental status (and thus is not on by default) so the improvements are welcome of course. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
