Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Sonntag, 11. September 2016, 13:43:59 CEST schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
The Nouveau graphics driver have a nice feature matrix on it's webpage
and I think that BTRFS perhaps should consider doing something like
that
on it's official wiki as well
BTRFS also has a feature matrix. The links to it are in the "News"
section
however:
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Changelog#By_feature
I disagree, this is not a feature / stability matrix. It is a clearly a
changelog by kernel version.
It is a *feature* matrix. I fully said its not about stability, but about
implementation – I just wrote this a sentence after this one. There is no
need whatsoever to further discuss this as I never claimed that it is a
feature / stability matrix in the first place.
Thing is: This just seems to be when has a feature been implemented
matrix.
Not when it is considered to be stable. I think this could be done with
colors or so. Like red for not supported, yellow for implemented and
green for production ready.
Exactly, just like the Nouveau matrix. It clearly shows what you can
expect from it.
I mentioned this matrix as a good *starting* point. And I think it would be
easy to extent it:
Just add another column called "Production ready". Then research / ask about
production stability of each feature. The only challenge is: Who is
authoritative on that? I´d certainly ask the developer of a feature, but I´d
also consider user reports to some extent.
Maybe thats the real challenge.
If you wish, I´d go through each feature there and give my own estimation. But
I think there are others who are deeper into this.
That is exactly the same reason I don't edit the wiki myself. I could of
course get it started and hopefully someone will correct what I write,
but I feel that if I start this off I don't have deep enough knowledge
to do a proper start. Perhaps I will change my mind about this.
I do think for example that scrubbing and auto raid repair are stable, except
for RAID 5/6. Also device statistics and RAID 0 and 1 I consider to be stable.
I think RAID 10 is also stable, but as I do not run it, I don´t know. For me
also skinny-metadata is stable. For me so far even compress=lzo seems to be
stable, but well for others it may not.
Since what kernel version? Now, there you go. I have no idea. All I know I
started BTRFS with Kernel 2.6.38 or 2.6.39 on my laptop, but not as RAID 1 at
that time.
See, the implementation time of a feature is much easier to assess. Maybe
thats part of the reason why there is not stability matrix: Maybe no one
*exactly* knows *for sure*. How could you? So I would even put a footnote on
that "production ready" row explaining "Considered to be stable by developer
and user oppinions".
Of course additionally it would be good to read about experiences of corporate
usage of BTRFS. I know at least Fujitsu, SUSE, Facebook, Oracle are using it.
But I don´t know in what configurations and with what experiences. One Oracle
developer invests a lot of time to bring BTRFS like features to XFS and RedHat
still favors XFS over BTRFS, even SLES defaults to XFS for /home and other non
/-filesystems. That also tells a story.
Some ideas you can get from SUSE releasenotes. Even if you do not want to use
it, it tells something and I bet is one of the better sources of information
regarding your question you can get at this time. Cause I believe SUSE
developers invested some time to assess the stability of features. Cause they
would carefully assess what they can support in enterprise environments. There
is also someone from Fujitsu who shared experiences in a talk, I can search
the URL to the slides again.
By all means, SUSE's wiki is very valuable. I just said that I *prefer*
to have that stuff on the BTRFS wiki and feel that is the right place
for it.
I bet Chris Mason and other BTRFS developers at Facebook have some idea on
what they use within Facebook as well. To what extent they are allowed to talk
about it… I don´t know. My personal impression is that as soon as Chris went
to Facebook he became quite quiet. Maybe just due to being busy. Maybe due to
Facebook being concerned much more about the privacy of itself than of its
users.
Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
