On 28/10/16 16:20, David Sterba wrote: > I tend to agree with this approach. The usecase, with some random sample > balance options: > > $ btrfs balance start --analyze -dusage=10 -musage=5 /path
Wouldn't a "balance analyze" command be better than "balance start --analyze"? I would have guessed the latter started the balance but printed some analysis as well (before or, probably more usefully, afterwards). There might, of course, be some point in a (future) $ btrfs balance start --if-needed -dusage=10 -musage=5 /path command. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
