On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 05:29:45PM +0100, Graham Cobb wrote: > On 28/10/16 16:20, David Sterba wrote: > > I tend to agree with this approach. The usecase, with some random sample > > balance options: > > > > $ btrfs balance start --analyze -dusage=10 -musage=5 /path > > Wouldn't a "balance analyze" command be better than "balance start > --analyze"? I would have guessed the latter started the balance but > printed some analysis as well (before or, probably more usefully, > afterwards).
Right, separate command seems better. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
