On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Darrick J. Wong <darrick.w...@oracle.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:54:09PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: >> Mark has already included XFS in documentation of duperemove, all that looks >> amiss is btrfs-extent-same having an obsolete name. But then, I never did >> any non-superficial tests on XFS, beyond "seems to work".
I'd actually be ok dropping btrfs-extent-same completely at this point but I'm concerned that it would leave some users behind. > /me wonders if ocfs2 will ever catch up to the reflink/dedupe party. ;) Hey, Ocfs2 started the reflink party! But yeah it's fallen behind since then with respect to cow and dedupe. More importantly though I'd like to see some extra extent tracking in there like XFS did with the reflink b+tree. --Mark -- "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." Hunter S. Thompson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
