On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 03:11:06PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
>
> This reverts commit c45653c341f5c8a0ce19c8f0ad4678640849cb86 because
> sb_getblk_gfp is not really needed as
> sb_getblk
> __getblk_gfp
> __getblk_slow
> grow_buffers
> grow_dev_page
> gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_constraint(inode->i_mapping, ~__GFP_FS) | gfp
>
> so __GFP_FS is cleared unconditionally and therefore the above commit
> didn't have any real effect in fact.
>
> This patch should not introduce any functional change. The main point
> of this change is to reduce explicit GFP_NOFS usage inside ext4 code to
> make the review of the remaining usage easier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
If I'm not mistaken, this patch is not dependent on any of the other
patches in this series (and the other patches are not dependent on
this one). Hence, I could take this patch via the ext4 tree, correct?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
