On Mon 16-01-17 22:01:18, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 03:11:06PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > From: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com> > > > > This reverts commit c45653c341f5c8a0ce19c8f0ad4678640849cb86 because > > sb_getblk_gfp is not really needed as > > sb_getblk > > __getblk_gfp > > __getblk_slow > > grow_buffers > > grow_dev_page > > gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_constraint(inode->i_mapping, ~__GFP_FS) | gfp > > > > so __GFP_FS is cleared unconditionally and therefore the above commit > > didn't have any real effect in fact. > > > > This patch should not introduce any functional change. The main point > > of this change is to reduce explicit GFP_NOFS usage inside ext4 code to > > make the review of the remaining usage easier. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com> > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz> > > If I'm not mistaken, this patch is not dependent on any of the other > patches in this series (and the other patches are not dependent on > this one). Hence, I could take this patch via the ext4 tree, correct?
Yes, that is correct -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html