On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:33:55AM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > None of the checks need to know the RO/RW status. >
OK...there was a readonly check, which lets us skip all checks, it was removed by the below commit, should we add the check back? commit 1104a8855109a4051d74977f819a13b4516aa11e Author: David Sterba <dste...@suse.cz> Date: Wed Mar 6 15:57:46 2013 +0100 btrfs: enhance superblock checks The superblock checksum is not verified upon mount. <awkward silence> Add that check and also reorder existing checks to a more logical order. Current mkfs.btrfs does not calculate the correct checksum of super_block and thus a freshly created filesytem will fail to mount when this patch is applied. First transaction commit calculates correct superblock checksum and saves it to disk. Reproducer: $ mfks.btrfs /dev/sda $ mount /dev/sda /mnt $ btrfs scrub start /mnt $ sleep 5 $ btrfs scrub status /mnt ... super:2 ... Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jba...@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.ma...@fusionio.com> Thanks, -liubo > Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 8 +++----- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c > index 441a62cd0351..2b06f557c176 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c > @@ -64,8 +64,7 @@ > static const struct extent_io_ops btree_extent_io_ops; > static void end_workqueue_fn(struct btrfs_work *work); > static void free_fs_root(struct btrfs_root *root); > -static int btrfs_check_super_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, > - int read_only); > +static int btrfs_check_super_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info); > static void btrfs_destroy_ordered_extents(struct btrfs_root *root); > static int btrfs_destroy_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_transaction *trans, > struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info); > @@ -2801,7 +2800,7 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, > > memcpy(fs_info->fsid, fs_info->super_copy->fsid, BTRFS_FSID_SIZE); > > - ret = btrfs_check_super_valid(fs_info, sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY); > + ret = btrfs_check_super_valid(fs_info); > if (ret) { > btrfs_err(fs_info, "superblock contains fatal errors"); > err = -EINVAL; > @@ -4115,8 +4114,7 @@ int btrfs_read_buffer(struct extent_buffer *buf, u64 > parent_transid) > return btree_read_extent_buffer_pages(fs_info, buf, parent_transid); > } > > -static int btrfs_check_super_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, > - int read_only) > +static int btrfs_check_super_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) > { > struct btrfs_super_block *sb = fs_info->super_copy; > u64 nodesize = btrfs_super_nodesize(sb); > -- > 2.10.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html