On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:42:07PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 06:11:56PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:33:55AM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > > > None of the checks need to know the RO/RW status. > > > > > > > OK...there was a readonly check, which lets us skip all checks, > > it was removed by the below commit, should we add the check back? > > All the current checks do not modify the superblock, so it's read-only > and we can keep it as-is. The superblock is available from inside the > function anyway so we don't need to check sb_flags externally. I'll > update the changelog. Yes, this makes sense.
Thanks, -liubo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
