On 29.09.2017 22:43, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Move the extent_op cleanup for an empty head ref to a helper function to
> help simplify __btrfs_run_delayed_refs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jba...@fb.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 77
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index f356b4a66186..f4048b23c7be 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -2587,6 +2587,26 @@ unselect_delayed_ref_head(struct
> btrfs_delayed_ref_root *delayed_refs,
> btrfs_delayed_ref_unlock(head);
> }
>
> +static int cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
Do we really need the fs_info as a separate argument, since we can
obtain it from trans->fs_info, admittedly this would require refactoring
run_delayed_extent_op as well? Looking at the other patches which
simplify delayed refs there are numerous function which take both a
transaction and a fs_info. Is there a case where trans' fs_info is not
the same as the fs_info based, I'd say no?
> + struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head)
> +{
> + struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op *extent_op = head->extent_op;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!extent_op)
> + return 0;
> + head->extent_op = NULL;
> + if (head->must_insert_reserved) {
> + btrfs_free_delayed_extent_op(extent_op);
> + return 0;
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> + ret = run_delayed_extent_op(trans, fs_info, &head->node, extent_op);
> + btrfs_free_delayed_extent_op(extent_op);
> + return ret ? ret : 1;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Returns 0 on success or if called with an already aborted transaction.
> * Returns -ENOMEM or -EIO on failure and will abort the transaction.
> @@ -2667,16 +2687,6 @@ static noinline int __btrfs_run_delayed_refs(struct
> btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> continue;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * record the must insert reserved flag before we
> - * drop the spin lock.
> - */
> - must_insert_reserved = locked_ref->must_insert_reserved;
> - locked_ref->must_insert_reserved = 0;
> -
> - extent_op = locked_ref->extent_op;
> - locked_ref->extent_op = NULL;
> -
> if (!ref) {
>
>
> @@ -2686,33 +2696,17 @@ static noinline int __btrfs_run_delayed_refs(struct
> btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> */
> ref = &locked_ref->node;
>
> - if (extent_op && must_insert_reserved) {
> - btrfs_free_delayed_extent_op(extent_op);
> - extent_op = NULL;
> - }
> -
> - if (extent_op) {
> - spin_unlock(&locked_ref->lock);
> - ret = run_delayed_extent_op(trans, fs_info,
> - ref, extent_op);
> - btrfs_free_delayed_extent_op(extent_op);
> -
> - if (ret) {
> - /*
> - * Need to reset must_insert_reserved if
> - * there was an error so the abort stuff
> - * can cleanup the reserved space
> - * properly.
> - */
> - if (must_insert_reserved)
> -
> locked_ref->must_insert_reserved = 1;
> - unselect_delayed_ref_head(delayed_refs,
> - locked_ref);
> - btrfs_debug(fs_info,
> - "run_delayed_extent_op
> returned %d",
> - ret);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + ret = cleanup_extent_op(trans, fs_info, locked_ref);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + unselect_delayed_ref_head(delayed_refs,
> + locked_ref);
> + btrfs_debug(fs_info,
> + "run_delayed_extent_op returned %d",
> + ret);
> + return ret;
> + } else if (ret > 0) {
> + /* We dropped our lock, we need to loop. */
> + ret = 0;
> continue;
> }
>
> @@ -2761,6 +2755,15 @@ static noinline int __btrfs_run_delayed_refs(struct
> btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> WARN_ON(1);
> }
> }
> + /*
> + * record the must insert reserved flag before we
> + * drop the spin lock.
> + */
> + must_insert_reserved = locked_ref->must_insert_reserved;
> + locked_ref->must_insert_reserved = 0;
> +
> + extent_op = locked_ref->extent_op;
> + locked_ref->extent_op = NULL;
> spin_unlock(&locked_ref->lock);
>
> ret = run_one_delayed_ref(trans, fs_info, ref, extent_op,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
